ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2025
Benchmarking heterogeneous network-based methods for drug repurposing.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug repurposing (DR) has gained significant attention as a cost-effective strategy for identifying new therapeutic uses for existing drugs. Heterogeneous network-based methods are particularly promising because they exploit complex biological interactions. However, comprehensive benchmarking across multiple datasets is still needed to assess their reliability and generalizability. We systematically evaluate ten advanced heterogeneous network-based DR methods across eight datasets, including six publicly available and two newly introduced drug-disease datasets. The methods include (i) matrix factorization: NMF, NMF-PDR, NMF-DR, VDA-GKSBMF, (ii) matrix completion: BNNR, OMC, HGIMC, (iii) recommendation systems: IBCF, LIBMF, and (iv) a deep learning approach: DRDM. Performance is assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) and precision-recall curve (AUPR). We also analyze the impact of data sparsity and compare findings with previous benchmarking studies. Our results reveal that OMC consistently achieves the highest AUC and AUPR across most datasets. BNNR, DRDM, HGIMC, VDA-GKSBMF, and NMF-PDR, also demonstrate competitive performance, with NMF-PDR outperforming other NMF-based approaches. We find that differences in cross-validation strategies substantially impact reported AUPR values, with previous studies overestimating performance by omitting many negative instances. This work provides a reliable benchmarking framework and new datasets, offering insights for future research in DR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.