Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366160›Full record

ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2025

Similarity as likelihood ratio: Coupling representations from machine learning (and other sources) with cognitive models.

Gregory E Cox

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gregory E CoxDepartment of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, 1400 Washington Ave., Albany, NY, 12222, USA. gregcox7@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0602-1545

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Similarity lies at the core of theories of memory and perception. To understand similarity relations among complex items like text and images, researchers often rely on machine learning to derive high-dimensional vector representations of those items. To use these representations to explain and predict human performance, a cognitive model must establish a relationship between vector similarity and the psychological construct of similarity. To that end, I introduce SALR ("similarity as likelihood ratio"), a mathematical transformation of the similarity between vector representations, operationalized as the cosine of the angle between them, into a ratio of the relative likelihood that the two representations encode the same versus different items. The likelihood ratio operationalizes similarity in a manner that is motivated by theories of perception and memory while also being readily "plugged in" to existing cognitive models. Three example applications show how SALR can be used to compute drift rates of a diffusion decision model based on similarity information derived from machine learning models, thereby accounting for the speed and accuracy with which individual participants respond to individual items. SALR enables inferences regarding how different people represent items, how much information they encode about each item, and how that information is affected by experimental manipulations. SALR serves both the practical purpose of making it easier to incorporate representations from machine learning - indeed, any method in which similarity is operationalized as a cosine - into cognitive models and the theoretical purpose of allowing cognitive models to grant insight into how people process the increasingly complex, naturalistic items to which machine learning models are applied.

Indexed as

CognitionMachine LearningMemoryModels, PsychologicalHumansLikelihood FunctionsCognitive modelsCognitive psychometricsMachine learningRecognition memorySimilarity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.