Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366155›Full record

Observational studyJournal of robotic surgery2025

Patient interests and perspectives regarding robotic-assisted total joint arthroplasty in India: A cross-sectional study.

Supreet Bajwa, Kunal Aneja, Ravi Teja Rudraraju, Ponnanna Karineravanda Machaiah, Chetan Sood

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Supreet BajwaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Wockhardt Hospitals, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. supreetbajwa90@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2325-7653
Kunal AnejaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2110-8275
Ravi Teja RudrarajuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0749-9636
Ponnanna Karineravanda MachaiahDepartment of Orthopaedics,Sparsh Hospital, Yeshwanthpur, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9093-9892
Chetan SoodDepartment of Clinico Marketing and Medical Writing, Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd, Vapi, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobotic-assisted total joint arthroplasty (rTJA) is increasingly adopted worldwide for its precision and reproducibility. In India, where technology uptake is steadily and rapidly growing but cost-sensitive, patient perceptions of rTJA remain crucial to understand.

objectiveThis cross-sectional observational study aims to assess the level of interest, awareness, and perceived advantages and limitations of rTJA among Indian patients, specifically those diagnosed with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee and osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) of the hip.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted between January and June 2025 among 500 patients with end-stage knee OA or ONFH attending a tertiary private orthopedic hospital in India. A structured, expert-reviewed and pilot-tested questionnaire assessed demographics, awareness, interest, and perceived benefits or limitations of rTJA. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression to identify factors independently associated with patient interest. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsAmong 500 respondents (mean age 54.3 years; 57% male), 72% expressed interest in rTJA. Interest was comparable across gender (71.1% males vs. 72.8% females; p = 0.707), age groups (< 50 years 74.2%, 50–65 years 71.2%, > 65 years 69.3%; p = 0.241), education levels (range 67.2–76.8%; p = 0.070), and insurance status (insured 71.9% vs. uninsured 71.8%; p = 0.499). Most participants perceived improved accuracy (75.6%) and reduced complications (79.8%) as key benefits, while high cost (85.4%) and surgeon learning curve (62.8%) remained major concerns.

conclusionIndian patients show growing acceptance of rTJA, but financial constraints and misconceptions remain barriers. Greater patient education, insurance support, and surgeon training are key to wider adoption.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, ReplacementArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemur Head NecrosisOsteoarthritis, KneeRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesCost-effectiveness and insurance limitationsKnee and hip arthroplasty trendsMISSO joint systemsPatient perspectives in orthopedic surgeryRobotic-assisted total joint arthroplastyTechnology adoption in indian healthcare

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.