ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2025
Reading numbers is hard, and the difficulty is a syntactic one: a descriptive analysis of number-reading patterns in readers with and without dysnumeria.
Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the linguistic complexity of third-grade numerical literacy.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2024Article
- Syntactic chunking reveals a core syntactic representation of multi-digit numbers, which is generative and automatic.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Number transcoding, the ability to convert digits to words and vice versa, is a critical skill in mathematical literacy and in everyday life. While transcoding is known to be difficult for children, it is unclear whether it challenges adults too, and if so, what the source of that difficulty is. Here, we analyzed the number reading performance of 172 neurotypical adults. Their mean error rate was 6.5%, considerably higher than that typically observed in word-reading tasks, indicating that transcoding is a relatively challenging task even in adulthood. To investigate the cognitive origin of this difficulty, we examined the error types produced by these participants, as well as by a second group of 51 adults with a number-reading deficit (dysnumeria, mean error rate of 28.7%). In both groups, most errors reflected corruptions of the number's syntactic structure. Moreover, among adults with dysnumeria, the most common subtype was syntactic dysnumeria. These findings indicate that, as in children, the primary challenge in adult number reading lies in the processing of the number's syntactic structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.