ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025
Rapid development of inhibitory effects in response to novel features: It's mostly target-feature enhancement.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In some visual search scenarios, the presence of a singleton distractor leads to faster search performance. This has been coined as the inhibition effect and is believed to represent avoidance of the singleton distractor. Research has identified two contributing components: a bias towards target features, target-feature enhancement, a bias away from distractor features, distractor-feature suppression. The current study examines how each of these effects independently develops in response to novel stimuli. In short blocks participants completed a search for a pre-defined target shape. Each block the colour of the target and the distractor were randomized so that the initial and subsequent attentional adaptations to these features could be assessed (via eye-tracking). These mini-blocks reveal substantial information about the development of the inhibition effect. Incredibly, we observe the classic inhibition effect (shorter RTs on distractor-present trials) as soon as the second trial of each block. Furthermore, the effect emerged even if it was the first presentation of the distractor feature. Gaze analysis concurs with this, eyes avoided the distractor when the target feature was known, but the distractor feature unknown. This shows compelling evidence for guidance from target-feature enhancement. However, some evidence for distractor-feature suppression is observed, further oculomotor suppression of the distractor is seen after its initial presentation. Together, the current results show that the inhibition effect develops rapidly in visual search displays, and that while a large portion of the effect can be accounted for by target-enhancement, distractor-suppression may still have a role in influencing attentional allocations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41366118What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.