ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Application of Micro-Plasma Radiofrequency in Promoting Wound Healing of Infected Skin Ulcers.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the efficacy of micro-plasma radio-frequency (MPRF) in enhancing the healing of infected skin ulcers.
methodsThis study involved ten patients diagnosed with infected skin ulcers between May and December 2023. Treatments were administered using MPRF every three days until the ulcers healed completely. We assessed microbial infection status, wound healing progression, healing duration, and changes in patient-reported symptoms such as pain and itching. We also monitored for adverse effects, including erythema and blisters, and evaluated scar formation post-healing.
resultsCultures from the wounds of all ten patients became negative after 2-8 MPRF treatments. After 7-15 treatments, over 90% of the ulcers healed, indicating an effective therapeutic outcome. Patients reported no itching or discomfort during treatment, experiencing only transient, mild, and tolerable pain. No cases of erythema, edema, or other skin irritations were observed. Six-month follow-up showed mild scarring in the treated areas, primarily presenting as hyperpigmentation or hypopigmentation.
conclusionsMicro-plasma radio-frequency (MPRF) demonstrates significant potential in promoting the healing of infected skin ulcers. This is evidenced by the rapid bacterial clearance (cultures turning negative after 2-8 treatments) and a high healing rate (>90% after 7-15 treatments) observed in all 10 patients. Furthermore, its ease of operation, convenient application, and favorable safety profile-characterized by transient, mild, and tolerable pain, absence of local skin irritation (e.g., erythema, edema), and mild scar formation (primarily hyper- or hypopigmentation) upon 6-month follow-up-underscore its promise. While these preliminary findings are encouraging, further large-scale clinical studies are warranted to conclusively establish the efficacy and long-term safety of MPRF in wound healing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This study is classified as a case series, as it included only 10 patients and lacked a control group for comparison. Such a study design does not provide high-level evidence of causality; its findings primarily offer descriptive observations and preliminary evidence for future higher-quality research, such as randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41366103What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.