Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366102›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Hamstring strength and hip mobility associated with pain and disability in lumbar instability.

Tomasz Kuligowski, Agnieszka Dębiec-Bąk, Błażej Cieślik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tomasz KuligowskiFaculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Wroclaw, 51- 612, Poland.
Agnieszka Dębiec-BąkFaculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Wroclaw, 51- 612, Poland.
Błażej CieślikHealthcare Innovation Technology Lab, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venezia, 30126, Italy. blazej.cieslik@hsancamillo.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic low back pain (LBP) has been hypothesized to involve lumbar instability, yet the roles of hamstring strength and hip mobility remain underexplored. While earlier studies focused on hamstring tightness, this study examined how these factors are strongly associated with pain and disability in young adults with lumbar instability. A case-control study was conducted on 129 participants (67 symptomatic, 62 asymptomatic) aged 18-35 years. Hamstring strength was assessed using the NordBord dynamometer, while hip mobility was measured using a goniometer. Pain intensity and disability were evaluated using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and Oswestry Disability Index. Hamstring strength showed a strong negative correlation with pain (r = -0.71, p < 0.001) and disability (r = -0.72, p < 0.001). Regression analysis confirmed hamstring strength and hip mobility as key correlates of LBP severity. Cutoff values were determined for hamstring strength (Female: 178.0 N; Male: 197.5 N), hip internal rotation (Female: 23°; Male: 18°), and hip extension (Female: 21°; Male: 19°). Hamstring strength and hip mobility are key correlates of pain and disability in young adults with clinically defined lumbar instability. Candidate thresholds showed apparent in-sample discrimination and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than diagnostic.

Indexed as

Hamstring MusclesHipHip JointJoint InstabilityLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeMuscle StrengthAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementRange of Motion, ArticularYoung AdultHamstring strengthHip mobilityLow back painLumbar instabilityPhysiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID41366102
PMCPMC12816697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.