ReviewParasitology research2025
Baylisascaris procyonis on the rise in Europe: a comprehensive review and analysis of occurrence data.
Review in Parasitology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The raccoon roundworm (Baylisascaris procyonis) was introduced to Europe by its final host, the North American raccoon (Procyon lotor), which has been spreading uncontrollably there since the early 20th century. The raccoon is gaining importance due to the spread of the raccoon roundworm, which is pathogenic to humans and can cause severe disease through oral ingestion of infectious egg stages. Totally, 146 raccoons from central and western Germany were examined for B. procyonis via necropsy. In addition, an extensive literature search was conducted on the occurrence of B. procyonis in Europe. Of the 146 raccoons examined in this study, 66.4% were infected with B. procyonis: 77.4% in Hesse (n = 84), 51.1% in Thuringia (n = 45), and 52.9% in North Rhine-Westphalia (n = 17). The literature review revealed the presence of B. procyonis in wild raccoons in nine European countries. In three additional countries, infections were detected in raccoons or other animal species in captivity. The studies show a steady expansion of the distribution area, which is probably underestimated due to insufficient or absent data collection. Five animal species have been identified as paratenic/accidental hosts in Europe, with all infections documented in zoos/animal husbandry. There is a lack of data on paratenic hosts in the wild in Europe. There are three documented cases of Baylisascariasis in Europe. The results of the present study highlight the need for further research into B. procyonis in Europe, particularly in relation to ongoing urbanization and growing raccoon populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.