ArticlePflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2025
Differential effect of pulsatile pressure on the myogenic responses of small arteries.
Article in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The myogenic response is an important regulatory mechanism under physiological as well as pathophysiological conditions. However, little is known about the myogenic response under pulsatile pressure conditions. Therefore, based on the known mechanisms governing the myogenic response induced by static pressure, we tested the hypothesis that a stronger myogenic response induced by pulsatile pressure is due to a larger increase of the intracellular calcium concentration and/or a higher calcium sensitivity of vessel tone. Rat small tail and gracilis arteries were studied using isobaric myography and FURA-2 fluorimetry. We found that in small tail arteries, the effect of pulsatile pressure on the myogenic response is determined by its systolic pressure, whereas in gracilis arteries, the effect of pulsatile pressure is determined by its mean pressure. Interestingly, the effect of pulsatile pressure on the intracellular calcium concentration in both vessels is determined by its systolic pressure. However, while calcium sensitivity of myogenic tone did not differ between static and pulsatile pressure conditions in small tail arteries, it was weaker under pulsatile pressure than under static pressure in gracilis arteries. In conclusion, a stronger myogenic response under pulsatile pressure conditions, i.e., the capability of a vessel to respond to systolic pressure, requires the vessel's ability to maintain and not lose the calcium sensitivity of myogenic tone compared to static pressure conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.