Trial reportScientific reports2025
Nasopharyngeal airway oxygenation enhances safe apnea time in patients at moderately high altitude: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the safe apnea time in patients at moderate high altitude and the effect of combining a nasopharyngeal airway. Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to either a preoxygenation group (Group P) or a nasopharyngeal airway group (Group N).P Group: Standard facemask preoxygenation was followed by intravenous induction with maintenance guided by bispectral index (BIS) monitoring (40-60);N Group: Building upon the P group protocol, a nasopharyngeal airway delivering 12 L/min pure oxygen for apneic oxygenation was inserted prior to laryngoscopy The primary outcome was the safe apnea time in both groups. Secondary outcomes included the maximum PetCO₂ after resumption of ventilation, hemodynamic parameters, and others.The results demonstrated that the safe apnea time in Group P was 506 (399-613) s, whereas in Group N it was prolonged to 732 (492-900) s. No significant hemodynamic differences were observed between the groups. Following resumption of ventilation, Group N exhibited a lower PetCO₂ and higher PaO₂ on arterial blood gas analysis at T3.Preoxygenation combined with apneic oxygenation via a nasopharyngeal airway extends the safeapnea time without causing adverse hemodynamic effects, offering a clinically feasible strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.