ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploratory associations between radiographic findings and metadata-derived proxies of 90-day follow-up in 112,120 ChestX-ray14 radiographs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chest radiography is widely used as an initial imaging modality. However, how specific findings relate to subsequent care or follow-up actions remains unclear. Prior studies have rarely examined follow-up actions, and potential sex-specific differences have been understudied. We analyzed 112,120 frontal chest radiographs from the NIH ChestX-ray14 dataset (63,340 male, 48,780 female). Images were labeled with 14 findings using a natural language processing (NLP) pipeline applied to reports. We modeled a metadata-derived proxy of 90-day follow-up using logistic regression, including sex-stratified analyses and interaction testing, with models adjusted for sex. Robustness was assessed through sensitivity analyses (30/60/180-day windows), patient-level clustering, and false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment. The strongest associations with proxy follow-up were observed for pulmonary edema (OR 10.6, 95% CI 8.5-13.2), pneumothorax (OR 7.6, 95% CI 6.7-8.6), and pleural effusion (OR 4.0, 95% CI 3.8-4.3). Interactions between sex and specific findings were modest but reached statistical significance for atelectasis (P = 0.003), pneumothorax (P = 0.0083), and emphysema (P = 0.0238). Radiographic findings were associated with metadata-derived proxy follow-up, but residual confounding from unmeasured factors (e.g., age, comorbidities, clinical context) likely remains. Sex-specific effects were statistically significant but small, and not clinically meaningful. Results should therefore be interpreted strictly as hypothesis-generating signals, not as causal evidence or clinically directive guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.