ArticleScientific reports2025
Barriers to assistive technology uptake among persons with disabilities in selected urban districts in Ghana.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
"Assistive technology'' (hereinafter AT) refers to equipment, products, and software designed or adapted to assist individuals to perform a specific task they might otherwise find difficult. AT is gradually becoming a fundamental human right across the globe. This is reinforced in international frameworks such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. However, the lack of empirical data on the prevalence and usage of AT in Ghana poses a significant barrier for policymakers to develop mainstream interventions for disability. The study used a quantitative cross-sectional survey design to examine the prevalence of AT and barriers to its use among 189 persons with mobility and visual impairments in four selected districts in the Ashanti region. The results indicated a relatively high AT utilisation rate of 66% among urban dwellers with disabilities. AT use is lower among women compared to men, with respective utilisation rates of 43.4% and 56.6%. About half of the mobility-impaired participants (50.4%) and 44% of the visually impaired participants identified high device costs as a major barrier. Difficulties in device use (21%) and stigma associated with AT (23.8%) further limited effective adoption. The study underscores the importance of enhancing the equitable distribution of assistive technologies in Ghana.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.