Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366017›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Prediction of drug approvals in oncology using explainable artificial intelligence.

Takashi Watanabe, Shota Nemoto, Hiroki Kato, Tetsu Isomura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Takashi WatanabeDepartment of Digital & IT Strategy, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan. taka.watanabe@ono-pharma.com.
Shota NemotoIndustrial & Digital Business Unit, Hitachi, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki KatoIndustrial & Digital Business Unit, Hitachi, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsu IsomuraDepartment of Digital & IT Strategy, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncology is characterized by vigorous drug development, including the introduction of novel therapeutic approaches. However, the success rate of clinical trials in oncology is markedly lower than that in other disease areas. Previous studies have developed machine learning models to predict drug approval by utilizing drug development and clinical trial data to optimize drug development portfolios. However, these models do not adequately quantify trial design information specific to oncology, which is considered insufficient for portfolio optimization in this domain. In this study, we developed a machine learning model that incorporates oncology-specific trial design information to predict drug approval. The prediction models we constructed achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86 to 0.98 and demonstrated high accuracy in prospective validation. Furthermore, our findings suggested that features related to trial duration, the number of enrolled patients and the number of products launched by the sponsor contributed to the prediction of drug approval. By utilizing the predictive model established in this study, estimates of the approval probabilities for drugs in the oncology pipeline can be provided, thereby aiding the strategic planning of drug development.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsArtificial IntelligenceDrug ApprovalMedical OncologyNeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicDrug DevelopmentHumansMachine LearningROC CurveAntineoplastic AgentsClinical trialDrug approvalMachine learningOncologyPrediction model

Identifiers

PMID41366017
PMCPMC12808163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.