ArticleScientific reports2025
Tracking mangrove restoration using a biogeochemical soil health index and ecosystem service indicators.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mangrove forests provide critical soil-related ecosystem services (ES), including carbon sequestration, contaminant retention, and nutrient cycling-all closely linked to soil health. However, land-use change and pollution increasingly threaten mangrove soils, compromising their functionality and ES provision. To reverse these impacts, effective strategies must begin with robust assessments of soil health using key indicators that also reflect ecosystem functions. Despite their importance, soil health indexing methods for mangroves remain underdeveloped. This study proposes a soil health index (SHI) for mangrove ecosystems, applied in northeastern Brazil across degraded, restoring (9 and 13 years), and mature forests. We assessed variables linked to biogeochemical processes governing carbon dynamics (soil texture, soil organic carbon - SOC, pseudo-total Fe), contaminant immobilization (exchangeable, carbonate-bound, oxyhydroxide-bound, and pyritic Fe, redox potential, and pH), and nutrient cycling (β-glucosidase, acid phosphatase, and available phosphorus). SHI was constructed using a minimal dataset selected via principal component analysis. Mature mangroves showed the highest SHI values (0.99 ± 0.03), while degraded sites had the lowest (0.25 ± 0.01). Replanted areas displayed intermediate SHI values (0.37 ± 0.01 at 9 years; 0.52 ± 0.02 at 13 years), indicating gradual recovery. ES provision estimates followed the same trend. The SHI effectively captured soil health changes across degradation and restoration gradients and is a promising tool to inform decision-makers, support conservation planning, and communicate complex data in accessible formats. This approach strengthens links between science, restoration action, and ecosystem service outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.