ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced three-dimensional mapping of soil texture components using quantile regression forest and spline techniques in Jiangsu Province, China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) modeling of soil texture components serves as an essential tool for the sustainable management of soil and agricultural resources. In this study, a 3D modeling framework was applied in Jiangsu Province, China, integrating the equal-area spline function with the Quantile Regression Forest (QRF) algorithm. Soil profile measurements of sand, silt, and clay contents were smoothed using the spline function across five standard depth intervals: 0-25, 25-50, 50-75, 75-100, and 100-125 cm. These processed data, together with 16 environmental covariates, were employed as inputs to the QRF model to generate depth-specific predictive maps of soil texture components. The model exhibited strong predictive performance in the surface layer (0-25 cm), with coefficients of determination (R2) of 0.78 for clay, 0.76 for sand, and 0.77 for silt. However, accuracy declined with depth, reaching R2 values of 0.55, 0.54, and 0.52 for clay, sand, and silt, respectively, at 100-125 cm. Model error, expressed as the root mean square error (RMSE), increased with depth-from 8.1% for surface clay to 13.4% in the deepest layer. Variable importance analysis identified piezometric elevation, precipitation, the Grain Size Index (GSI), the spectral band ratio Band3/Band7, and topographic indices such as the Multiresolution Ridge Top Flatness (MrRTF) as the most influential predictors of soil texture. Furthermore, uncertainty evaluation using the Prediction Interval Coverage Probability (PICP) index revealed decreasing prediction reliability with greater depth. Based on these findings, future research should prioritize the use of higher-resolution elevation datasets, increase sampling density, and incorporate geological and land-use variables to enhance model accuracy and generalizability. This study presents a robust methodology for generating accurate, spatially consistent estimates of soil texture components across defined profile depths and provides a scientific foundation for advancing regional-scale 3D soil mapping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.