Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41365993›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Trajectories and thresholds of multitrophic diversities and multiple functions in response to nitrogen enrichment.

Yang Yang, Yang Li, Yaxiang Lü, Liangchao Jiang, Guojiao Yang, Binger An, Wei Liu, Jiamei Sun, Jing Wang, Zhengwen Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yang Yang *State Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yang Li *State Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yaxiang LüState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Liangchao JiangSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Guojiao YangSchool of Ecology, Hainan University, Haikou, China.
Binger AnState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wei LiuState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jiamei SunState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jing WangState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhengwen WangUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xingguo HanState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. xghan@ibcas.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1836-975X
Qingmin PanState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. pqm@ibcas.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4202-4807

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32230069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global nitrogen deposition has profound impacts on ecosystem biodiversity and functions. However, the response trajectories and thresholds of the diversities of multiple trophic groups and multiple functions to nitrogen enrichment remain unclear. Here, combining a field experiment with a global-scale meta-analysis of 92 nitrogen experiments in grasslands, we show that plant diversity follows a decrease-then-plateau pattern with increasing nitrogen amount, while the diversities of soil bacteria, fungi, protists, and invertebrates all exhibit a stable-then-decrease pattern. For ecosystem functions, plant productivity and ecosystem carbon uptake both follow an increase-then-plateau pattern, while soil organic matter decomposition is best fitted with a stable-then-increase curve and plant-microbe mutualism with a decrease-then-plateau pattern. Accordingly, the nitrogen thresholds differ substantially between ecosystem attributes. Furthermore, the mechanisms driving the diversity and function responses are highly attribute-dependent. Our findings suggested that the attribute-specific trajectories and thresholds should be incorporated into models forecasting ecosystem feedbacks to nitrogen enrichment.

Indexed as

BiodiversityNitrogenAnimalsCarbonEcosystemGrasslandPlantsSoilSoil MicrobiologyCarbonNitrogenSoil

Identifiers

PMID41365993
PMCPMC12804851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.