ArticleScientific reports2025
Decoding dog communication through the physiology and behavior of urine marking.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although olfaction is the main sensory domain in dogs and urinary markings are crucial behavioral patterns involved in canids' communication, the scientific literature on this topic is quite scarce. In the present work, we investigated the relationship between male dogs marking behavior (scored throughout different facial expression, marking distance from the target odor etc.) and physiological response (urine concentrations of the hormones mainly involved in the physiological responses to social stressors: cortisol, oxytocin, adrenaline, testosterone; and the neurotransmitters most responsible for cognitive flexibility: norepinephrine and dopamine) to different emotional odors. Specifically, the odour stimuli were urine odors collected from (1) an unfamiliar female in estrus, which were expected to increase male dogs' arousal level due to sexual interest; and of (2) an unfamiliar intact male showing overt agonistic behaviors toward conspecific males, which were expected to elicit the arousal level in the tested subjects representing a potential threat. Although preliminarily, our data would indicate a relationship between differences in the type of marking behavior of male dogs and both hormonal and neurotransmitters levels in their urines, suggesting a modulation in canine cognitive strategy during marking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.