Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41365982›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development and validation of a novel prediction model for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy based on maternal cardiovascular function and placental blood flow metrics at 22 to 24 gestational weeks using machine learning.

Juulia Lantto, Kari Flo, Åse Vårtun, Christian Widnes, Jonas Johnson, Ganesh Acharya

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juulia LanttoDivision of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kari FloDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Åse VårtunDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Christian WidnesDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Jonas JohnsonDivision of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. jonas.johnson@ki.se.
Ganesh AcharyaDivision of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. ganesh.acharya@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-1997-3107

Funding

The Regional Health Authority of North Norway
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) remain a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity worldwide, and current screening strategies have limited predictive value in low-risk populations especially for late-onset HDP. This study aimed to develop and internally validate an interpretable machine-learning model for predicting HDP using noninvasive parameters of maternal systemic hemodynamics, endothelial function, and utero-placental and feto-placental blood flow measured in mid-pregnancy. In this cross-sectional cohort, 577 normotensive women underwent impedance cardiography and Doppler ultrasonography at 22

Indexed as

Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedMachine LearningPlacentaPlacental CirculationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHemodynamicsHumansPre-EclampsiaPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, SecondHypertensive disorders of pregnancyMachine learningMaternal hemodynamicsPrediction modelUmbilical arteryUterine artery

Identifiers

PMID41365982
PMCPMC12695884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.