Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41365924›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

MGWO-CNN: hyperparameter optimization of CNN classifier for cervical cancer detection using Modified Grey Wolf Optimizer.

Sanat Jain, Ashish Jain, Mahesh Jangid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sanat JainSchool of Computing Science Engineering, VIT Bhopal University, Sehore, India.
Ashish JainDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Institute of Engineering and Technology, JK Lakshmipat University, Jaipur, India.
Mahesh JangidDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, India. mahesh.jangid@jaipur.manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every nation reports an increasing number of deaths among women due to cervical cancer each day, which has become a major global issue. Rapid diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer can reduce mortality rates. Most studies on cervical cancer detection have made use of ensemble methods and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models. However, overfitting, parameter adjustment, and gradient vanishing issues affect most of these models. To address these issues, we propose a Modified Grey Wolf Optimizer-based Convolutional Neural Network (MGWO-CNN) model that incorporates the concepts of chaos theory and differential evolution mutation to detect cervical cancer. Traditionally, neural networks combined with backpropagation achieve poor convergence due to their dependence on initial values. Metaheuristic techniques offer a superior alternative to backpropagation. The proposed technique adjusts CNN hyperparameters to train the model architecture effectively. This optimized model extracts key features from cervical Pap smear images and predicts the outcomes. The results demonstrate that the MGWO-CNN model is a remarkably effective method to detect cervical cancer. We evaluated the efficiency of the model by comparing its performance on two datasets (Herlev and SIPaKMeD) using four performance measures: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision. The proposed approach outperforms existing methods in terms of accuracy, precision, sensitivity and specificity, achieving values of 99.45%, 100%, 97.96%, and 100%, respectively.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAlgorithmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansPapanicolaou TestCervical cancerConvolutional neural networkFeature extractionMetaheuristics

Identifiers

PMID41365924
PMCPMC12695871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.