ArticleBMJ global health2025
Contribution and influence of social capital on corruption in the health sector: a view through the lens of service users.
Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe interplay between social capital and health system corruption in healthcare systems is underexplored, yet vital, a major barrier to advancing universal health coverage is underexplored. While social capital can support anticorruption by enabling collective action, it may also perpetuate corruption when networks are used to bypass procedures or access care unfairly. This study explores how social capital contributes to corrupt practices complex relationships play out in practice in Nigerian health facilities.
methodWe conducted a cross-sectional study across two Nigerian states, surveying 1659 households using a pretested interviewer-administered questionnaire. A composite measure of social capital was developed from key variables. We examined the relationship between social capital and engagement in corrupt practices, controlling for variables such as gender, age, education and group memberships. Data were analysed using univariate, bivariate and multivariate methods.
resultsAmong respondents, 60.3% were female, over 90% had formal education, and 75.6% lived with their spouse. Nearly half (49.6%) had experienced corruption when accessing healthcare. Of those who used connections to receive care, 11.8% did so specifically to secure treatment. Individuals relying on family and friends (69.7%) were more likely to engage in corruption, and those using political connections always did. Non-membership in professional associations and political parties significantly reduced the likelihood of corrupt behaviour by 57% and 36%, respectively (p<0.01). Active participation in religious organisations was linked to lower corruption, while involvement in political parties, governance structures and professional bodies increased the likelihood. Higher education was associated with a 90% increased chance of engaging in corrupt practices (p<0.01).
conclusionSocial capital has both enabling and constraining effects on corruption in Nigeria's healthcare system. Understanding its context-specific nature is crucial for designing effective anti-corruption strategies in health service delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.