Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41365592›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Unravelling the conceptualisation of unfinished care among physicians in acute care hospitals: a scoping review.

Simon Dello, Ken De Smet, Walter Sermeus

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simon Dello *Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium simon.dello@uzleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6043-1206
Ken De Smet *Department of Emergency Medicine, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium.
Walter SermeusDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5915-1845

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnfinished care-also referred to as care left undone, missed care or implicit rationing-has been widely studied in nursing but remains poorly defined and underexplored in the medical profession. Physicians play a central role in diagnosis, treatment and coordination of care, yet little is known about the extent, determinants and consequences of unfinished care in their daily work.

objectiveTo systematically map and synthesise existing evidence on how unfinished care among physicians in acute care hospitals has been conceptualised, measured and empirically studied. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Original, peer-reviewed studies on physicians working in acute care hospital settings that explicitly addressed unfinished care, care left undone, missed care, suboptimal care or closely related constructs at the microlevel of clinical work. EXCLUSIONS: primary care, allied professions, adherence to guidelines, underuse at the population level, explicit macrolevel rationing, non-original reports, non-English, no full text available. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: Five bibliographical databases PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS and CINAHL were searched in June 2024 to identify relevant studies. CHARTING

methodsTwo reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts against prespecified criteria defined following the population, concept, context framework, with consensus resolution. Data were charted on study characteristics, terminology/definitions, measurement approach and findings. Methodological quality was appraised by the authors and an external independent expert using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Qualitative and quantitative findings were charted, then synthesised via a descriptive and thematic analysis.

resultsUsing predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1971 potentially relevant titles and abstracts were identified and subsequently screened. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising three quantitative, three qualitative, one mixed methods and one quantitative non-randomised study. Only one study explicitly defined and measured 'care left undone', reporting that 78.3% of surveyed physicians had omitted at least one necessary care activity during their most recent shift. The terminology and clarity of concepts varied significantly across the studies (eg, 'shortcuts', 'missed opportunities', 'suboptimal care'). Identified drivers emerged at both organisational (eg, high workload, poor communication) and individual (eg, burnout, fatigue) levels. While two studies connected care left undone to adverse patient outcomes (eg, readmissions) and worse physician well-being, the overall evidence on its prevalence and consequences remains limited. Overall methodological quality of the included studies was moderate, but conceptual and theoretical development remained limited.

conclusionsThis scoping review reveals major conceptual and empirical gaps in the study of unfinished care among physicians. Terminology is inconsistent, theoretical grounding is weak, and validated measurement tools are lacking. Evidence on prevalence, determinants and consequences remains scarce and largely descriptive. To advance the field, future research must establish conceptual clarity, achieve terminological consensus and develop robust, validated instruments to capture how unfinished care manifests within complex clinical systems.

Indexed as

Health Care RationingPhysiciansHospitalsHumansPatient Care ManagementPhysiciansReview

Identifiers

PMID41365592
PMCPMC12699620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.