Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41365288›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2025

Ketogenic Nutrition in Combination With PPARα Activation Induced Metabolic Failure and Exacerbated Muscle Weakness in Septic Mice.

Caroline Lauwers, Wouter Vankrunkelsven, Sarah Derde, Sarah Vander Perre, Inge Derese, Lies Pauwels, Ilse Vanhorebeek, Louis Libbrecht, Pieter Vermeersch, Jan Gunst and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Caroline LauwersDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory and Clinical Division of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7278-2708
Wouter VankrunkelsvenDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory and Clinical Division of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0943-043X
Sarah DerdeDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory and Clinical Division of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0005-6724-643X
Sarah Vander PerreDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory and Clinical Division of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Inge DereseDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory and Clinical Division of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lies PauwelsDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory and Clinical Division of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ilse VanhorebeekDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory and Clinical Division of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5261-5192
Louis LibbrechtLaboratory of Hepatology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9453-3355
Pieter VermeerschClinical Department of Laboratory Medicine, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7076-061X
Jan GunstDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory and Clinical Division of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2470-6393
Greet Van den BergheDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory and Clinical Division of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5320-1362
Michael P CasaerDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory and Clinical Division of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7087-0795
Lies LangoucheDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory and Clinical Division of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8564-6809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuppression of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) has been related to poor outcomes in sepsis and may compromise ketogenesis during critical illness. Infusion of 3-hydroxybutyrate (3HB) was shown to attenuate muscle weakness in septic mice. We hypothesise that endogenous ketogenesis induced by pharmacological PPARα activation, either alone or combined with ketogenic nutrition, is safe and can also mitigate muscle weakness in septic mice.

methodsIn a fluid-resuscitated, antibiotic-treated mouse model of prolonged sepsis, we first (Study 1) assessed the safety and effectiveness (impact on ketosis and muscle weakness) of the PPARα agonist pemafibrate (1 mg/kg/d, n = 16), versus placebo (n = 15) combined with standard balanced parenteral nutrition (PN), composed of glucose, amino acids and long-chain triglycerides (LCT) (balanced-TPN). We subsequently (Study 2) evaluated the impact of pemafibrate combined with four types of PN on ketosis and muscle weakness: balanced-TPN (n = 18), TPN with extra LCTs (TPN + LCT, n = 18), low-dose pure LCT emulsion (Low-LCT, n = 16) and high-dose pure LCT emulsion (High-LCT n = 18). Carbohydrates and amino acids were omitted in the pure LCT groups. Healthy control mice (HC, n = 19) served as controls. Ex vivo muscle force was measured as the primary outcome. Metabolic, inflammatory and microstructural parameters were assessed on plasma and in muscle and liver tissue by targeted metabolomics, gene expression analysis, biochemical and metabolite assays and histological assessment.

resultsPemafibrate treatment with balanced-TPN upregulated hepatic gene expression of PPARα (Ppara) and its downstream genes (Cd36, Cpt1a, Atgl, Acadl, Hadha, Acox1, and Hmgcs2) (p < 0.0001) and was well tolerated. However, pemafibrate treatment with the use of balanced-TPN administration did not induce detectable ketosis or improve muscle weakness. In combination with pemafibrate, TPN + LCT also did not induce ketosis, nor did it affect muscle weakness. In contrast, 3-hydroxybutyrate plasma concentrations increased with High-LCT (95-fold) and Low-LCT (10-fold) (p < 0.0001) in combination with pemafibrate, yet muscle force declined further (High-LCT 25.0%, Low-LCT 10.7% of HC, p < 0.0001). Blood glucose was lowered with pure High-LCT and Low-LCT (High-LCT 86.9%, Low-LCT 55.1% of TPN, p < 0.05), while plasma lipids and LC-carnitines were increased (p < 0.0001). Markers of hepatic protein catabolism were upregulated with High-LCT and Low-LCT (p < 0.007), while muscle glycolytic intermediates (p < 0.0001) and ATP levels (p < 0.0001) were depleted.

conclusionsIn septic mice, pemafibrate combined with balanced-TPN or lipid-rich TPN induced PPARα activation but did not result in ketosis nor affect muscle weakness. Pemafibrate combined with pure LCTs induced ketosis in sepsis but worsened muscle weakness, possibly explained by muscular bioenergetic failure.

Indexed as

Diet, KetogenicMuscle WeaknessPPAR alphaSepsisAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMaleMicePPAR alphacritical illnessketone bodieslong‐chain triglyceridesmetabolismmuscle weaknessPPARαsepsis

Identifiers

PMID41365288
PMCPMC12688406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.