SynthesisClinical psychology review2026
Social support and internalizing psychopathology among sexual and gender minority individuals: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical psychology review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comparative study of sociodemographic characteristics, health cognition, and risky sexual behaviors between MSMO and MSMW in Zhejiang Province, Eastern China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals often suffer from a myriad of stressors within their social environments due to stigma and its outcomes (Meyer, 2003). Conversely, social support may impact SGM individuals' psychological resilience. To quantify the impact of their interpersonal environments, the current preregistered meta-analysis included 253 studies (N = 111,188) that reported associations between social support (i.e., family, peer, partner, school, work) and internalizing psychopathology (i.e., depression, anxiety, nonsuicidal self-injury, suicidality) among SGM samples. Overall, a small, negative association was observed, r = -0.26, with low levels of variance between studies. Larger effects were observed for depression than other measures of psychopathology, r = -0.29, while smaller effects were observed for suicidality, r = -0.17. Smaller effects were observed for samples with a larger share of bisexual individuals, and when a SGM-specific measure was used. Larger effects were observed for European studies performed in areas of greater structural stigma (but not for American studies). The negative association between social support and psychopathology was consistent across an array of demographic factors (e.g., age, gender, % white) and SGM identities (e.g., % gender minority). No evidence of publication bias was observed. These findings suggests that all forms of SGM social support are similarly associated with lower internalizing psychopathology to a small degree, most of all with regards to depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.