ArticleJMIR research protocols2025
Feasibility of Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn Case Ascertainment and Assessing Its Impact on Prenatal and Postnatal Outcomes: Protocol for Observational Studies.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is a rare but serious condition caused by maternal-fetal red blood cell antigen incompatibility. In an affected pregnancy, maternal immunoglobulin G antibodies cross the placenta and target fetal or neonatal red blood cells, leading to hemolysis, hyperbilirubinemia, and anemia. Although routine screening and alloimmunization prevention programs have contributed to the decline in HDFN in the United States, further understanding of its epidemiology is still needed.
objectiveThis protocol aims to provide an overview of the study design, methodology, and analytical approach used to investigate the epidemiology, treatment, and health care resource use of HDFN within a large integrated health care system.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women who received obstetric care in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) health care system from January 1, 2008, to June 30, 2022. To identify HDFN cases, we used a novel methodology developed by KPSC researchers combining structured data and detailed clinical information extracted from unstructured records via a natural language processing-assisted chart review process. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare the distributions of maternal and infant demographic characteristics, as well as medical and perinatal conditions, by HDFN status. We also evaluated the association between HDFN and adverse perinatal outcomes using logistic regression models. Planned analyses using this unique cohort will include describing the annual prevalence, health care resource use, and treatment patterns of mothers and infants by HDFN status.
resultsThe study population consisted of 464,711 pregnancies, of which 136 (0.03%) were HDFN cases confirmed by chart review, resulting in 138 (0.03%) births (n=137, 0.99% live births and n=1, 0.01% stillbirth). The mean age at pregnancy was 29.8 (SD 5.7) years, and the population was racially and ethnically diverse.
conclusionsWe present an overview of the methodology developed by KPSC clinicians and researchers on the epidemiology, treatment, and health care resource use of HDFN within a large and demographically diverse population of pregnant women. Our novel methodology, combining both structured and unstructured data and a natural language processing-assisted chart review process, ensures the successful identification of true cases to carry out pharmaco-epidemiological studies. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/77836.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.