ArticleDiving and hyperbaric medicine2025
The process, logistics and governance behind a high-stakes novel intervention: the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the hyperbaric chamber.
Article in Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying discrepancy between indicated and actual oxygen flow rates delivered by Comweld Ezi-flow low and standard flowmeters under hyperbaric conditions: a technical report.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2026Article
- Technical feasibility of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for gas embolism with ECMO support: a brief report.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Validation and clinical use of the Maquet (Getinge) original series Rotaflow extracorporeal membrane oxygenation device in hyperbaric conditions: a technical report.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2025Article
- Novel use of hyperbaric oxygen treatment for treatment-resistant disseminated Saksenaea and Fusarium in a patient on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): a case report.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A multi-trauma patient receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) developed severe disseminated vaso-invasive fungal disease. In the absence of any remaining treatment escalation options, hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) was considered as a last effort at gaining disease control. Previously, the use of modern ECMO devices had not been validated for hyperbaric use at our centre or, to the best of our knowledge, at any other centre around the world. We had, however, identified a potentially hyperbaric compatible ECMO device and had commenced a validation process. The aim of this report is to highlight the practical, operational and governance processes undertaken to safely provide HBOT utilising ECMO at short notice. Methods: A detailed risk assessment, development of risk reduction strategies and workflows, emergency out-of-session ethics review, clinical innovations committee review, legal advice, executive approvals and informed consent were undertaken over a 32-hour period prior to commencing HBOT. Results: We present the identified risks, governance approvals, workflow, staffing model, chamber layout and safety checklist utilised to successfully deliver thirteen HBOT sessions to a patient on venovenous (VV) ECMO. Conclusions: Through an extensive and coordinated effort involving multiple specialties and disciplines at our service, we were able to safely deliver HBOT to a patient supported by VV ECMO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.