Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41364761›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Globally aggregated biodiversity data impact predictive and descriptive research.

Dirk Steinke, Birgit Gemeinholzer, Enrique Martínez-Meyer, Daniel Noesgaard, Andrew Young, Dmitry Schigel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dirk SteinkeCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8992-575X
Birgit GemeinholzerUniversity Kassel, Faculty of Botany, Aufbau- und Verfügungszentrum (AVZ), Kassel 34132, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9145-9284
Enrique Martínez-MeyerDepartamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico 14510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1184-9264
Daniel NoesgaardGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility, Secretariat, København Ø 2100, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0407-1805
Andrew YoungCentre of Australian National Biodiversity Research, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0652-7503
Dmitry SchigelGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility, Secretariat, København Ø 2100, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2919-1168

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we present an analysis of the growth and use of the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) over the last 5 y. GBIF is the world's largest data integrator for biodiversity information and plays a central role in research across the biodiversity and evolutionary science community. With the help of a comprehensive bibliographic dataset comprising 12,193 studies that used GBIF-mediated data, we demonstrate how the global scientific community utilizes the continuously fast-growing amount of open and Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable biodiversity data in their research. Overall, more researchers engage with GBIF data, a potential consequence of the rising demands of more global environmental assessments, where GBIF-mediated data are being used as a key resource for biodiversity research. Studies utilizing species distribution modeling were most prevalent and data used for topics related to challenges of the Anthropocene (conservation, climate change, invasive, and pest species). More studies used observational data records, a category that also includes a substantial amount of citizen science data. Our data show that a thematic diversification of GBIF-using literature is accompanied by a rapid diversification of both the additional datasets that GBIF data are analyzed with, as well as the new analytical approaches taken by researchers. This emphasizes the growing importance of GBIF's data infrastructure and services which support global sciences and reflect major shifts in applied science which dictate the need for GBIF and similar data infrastructures to evolve rapidly in order to maintain relevance for research.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesDatabases, Factualbibliographic analysisdata infrastructureGBIFmachine learningoccurrence records

Identifiers

PMID41364761
PMCPMC12718365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.