ArticlePloS one2025
Factors impacting a patient's selection of an otolaryngologist.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHow a patient chooses a physician has not been evaluated in otolaryngology. Our purpose was to determine which factors are important for people in the selection of an otolaryngologist.
methodsThis study is a cross-sectional survey study using Amazon Mturk. Demographic data was collected. Participants rated 24 factors related to choosing an otolaryngologist on a 10-point scale. Multiple choice questions queried preferences on a physician's social media, clothing, gender, and personality.
resultsOut of 287 participants, 105 (36.6%) were female, 209 (72.8%) were between the ages of 25-40, and 252 (87.7%) identified as white. The majority of participants had primary residence in the southern US (N = 115, 38.3%) and were native-English speakers (N = 286, 99.7%). 254 (88.5%) had completed a Bachelor's degree, 232 (80.8%) were employed in healthcare, 237 (82.6%) had prior experience being treated by an otolaryngologist, and 275 (95.8%) rated their health status as good or better. The most important factors for respondents in choosing an otolaryngologist were "surgeon's explanation of their diagnosis and treatment", "the quality of their surgeon's office", "favorable office location", "the surgeon's ability to grasp their problem", "the surgeon's professionalism", and "the surgeon's physical examination". Regarding attire and personality, formal or business casual with a white coat was preferred (N = 124, 43.2%). Participants preferred surgeons with a combination of a professional and lighthearted personality (N = 145, 50.5%).
conclusionThe way in which an otolaryngologist engages with and examines a patient is most important to the lay public, although reputation carries some importance in choosing a doctor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.