Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41364726›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Where to flee? Preferences for host communities among displaced people in Congo.

Nik Stoop, Peter Van der Windt, Sigrid Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nik StoopInstitute of Development Policy, University of Antwerp, Research Foundation Flanders, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0787-8038
Peter Van der WindtDivision of Social Sciences, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1487-473X
Sigrid WeberSchool of Politics, Economics and Global Affairs, IE University, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0640-8096

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has explored host communities' attitudes toward displaced individuals, but much less is known about what displaced people seek in a host community. Understanding both perspectives is key to fostering successful local integration. We address this gap through a randomized conjoint experiment in which nearly 2,000 respondents in the Kasai region of the Democratic Republic of Congo - internally displaced persons (IDPs), returned IDPs, repatriated refugees, and members of the host community - evaluated hypothetical host communities, imagining where they would prefer to settle if forced to flee. Results indicate that, beyond safety, respondents prioritize job opportunities while also valuing social networks and political participation. Preferences are largely similar across groups. The findings suggest that the promotion of economic opportunities and inclusive governance are among the most effective strategies to create conditions conducive to local integration.

Indexed as

RefugeesDemocratic Republic of the CongoHumans

Identifiers

PMID41364726
PMCPMC12688085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.