ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Role of invasive Aedes (Aedimorphus) vittatus in chikungunya virus transmission in the newly-invaded coastal island city of Mombasa, Kenya.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCountrywide routine entomological surveillance studies in Kenya from 2006 first identified Aedes vittatus, in small numbers (4 specimens), in Mombasa city in 2014 during a dengue outbreak investigation. Significant numbers (1,648 specimens) were collected in January 2018 during a chikungunya outbreak investigation. The presence of Ae. vittatus, and a competent vector of chikungunya virus, complicates disease epidemiology and control efforts in Mombasa underscoring the need to determine its bionomic factors.
methodsIn June 2021 and December 2021, we conducted mosquito sampling at multiple sites in Mombasa, an island city county, using CO₂-baited Biogent sentinel (BGS) traps and human landing collection (HLC) methods. The collected mosquitoes were identified morphologically, and Ae. vittatus species were confirmed further by molecular characterization based on the cytochrome c oxidase I gene (cox1). Virus isolation from mosquitoes pools was performed in Vero ccl-81 cell cultures. Cultures showing cytopathic effects were harvested and genome-sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform to identify the infecting virus.
resultsA total of 11,435 mosquitoes were collected; 7,250 by BGS traps and 4,185 by HLC. Overall, Ae. aegypti was the dominant species, accounting for 32.6% (n = 3,725), followed by Culex quinquefasciatus which accounted for 31.8% (n = 3,638) and Ae. vittatus at 24.4% (n = 2,789). Aedes aegypti (n = 2,216; 43%) predominated in HLC collections, followed by Ae. vittatus (n = 1,598; 31%). Although mosquito biting rates per person per hour (b/p/h) were higher for Ae. aegypti (3.2 b/p/h) than Ae. vittatus (2.4 b/p/h), the difference was not statistically significant (t = 6.0081, df = 1, p-value = 0.105). Chikungunya virus isolate belonging to the East Central South African genotype was isolated from a pool of female Ae. vittatus.
conclusionAedes vittatus was found widely distributed across the island city in significant numbers, suggesting that the species, which is predominant to most rural areas in Kenya, has invaded the city and successfully established. The presence of this species in the city, a confirmed vector of CHIKV, and along with Ae. aegypti which is the principle vector of CHIKV, potentially magnifies the risk of chikungunya outbreaks. This highlights the significance and need for integrated vector control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.