ArticlePloS one2025
Reprogramming feedback strength in gibberellin biosynthesis highlights conditional regulation by the circadian clock and carbon dioxide.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic transcriptional repression systems in plants.Plant cell reports · 2026Review
- Integrating multiomic resources and gene expression studies to identify candidates for engineering climate-resilientFrontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The phytohormone gibberellin (GA) is an important regulator of plant morphology and reproduction, and the biosynthesis and distribution of GA in planta is agriculturally relevant to past and current breeding efforts. Tools like biosensors, extensive molecular genetic resources in reference plants and mathematical models have greatly contributed to current understanding of GA homeostasis; however, these tools are difficult to tune or repurpose for engineering crop plants. Previously, we showed that a GA-regulated Hormone Activated CAS9-based Repressor (GAHACR) functions in planta. Here, we use GAHACRs to modulate the strength of feedback on endemic GA regulated genes, and to directly test the importance of transcriptional feedback in GA signaling in the model eudicot Arabidopsis thaliana. We first adapted existing mathematical models to predict the impact of targeting a GAHACR to different nodes in the GA biosynthesis pathway, and then implemented a perturbation predicted by the model to lower GA levels. Specifically, we individually targeted either the biosynthetic gene GA20 oxidase (GA20ox) or the GA receptor GID1, and characterized primary root length, flowering time and the transcriptome of these transgenic lines. Using this approach, we identified a strong connection between GA signaling status and the circadian clock, which can be largely attenuated by elevated carbon dioxide levels. Our results identify a node in the GA signaling pathway that can be engineered to modulate plant size and flowering time. Our results also raise concerns that rising atmospheric CO2 concentration are likely to reverse many of the gains of Green Revolution crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.