ArticlePloS one2025
Examining the changing demand for orthotic service provision from routinely collected digital patient data: A national retrospective descriptive study across three clinics in Cambodia.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experiences of Accessing Physical Rehabilitation Services and Assistive Products Among Orthosis and Wheelchair Users: Qualitative Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Available data on the demand for orthotic services is limited, especially in low- and middle-income countries, yet the development and delivery of services relies on this information. In this study, routinely collected digital patient records are used to provide insights into orthotic service users from three Cambodian physical rehabilitation centres. Analysis of the digital patient records from 1998-2019 investigated trends by sex, clinic, reason for orthosis use, orthotic type, and age. The analysis showed that the characteristics of service users and the provision of orthotics have changed over time. The predominant reason for orthosis use prior to 2006 was polio, whereas in 2019 it was cerebral palsy. Ankle Foot Orthoses (AFOs) are the most common type of orthosis provided; however, key differences have been found between type of orthosis and age which suggests older individuals have different experiences of physical rehabilitation compared to younger age groups. Longitudinal trends indicate a substantial reduction in orthotics appointments which may be associated with change in service delivery and changing service user characteristics. The study has illustrated the insights which can be derived from digital patient records into the demand for orthotics services over two decades and demonstrates the need for targeted resources and planning for the provision of services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.