ArticlePloS one2025
Nurse-physician collaboration, autonomy, and decision-making ability among intensive care unit nurses in Tehran, Iran: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical decision-making by intensive care unit nurses is vital for ensuring patient safety. It is hypothesized that professional autonomy and interprofessional collaboration are determinants that influence the quality of decision-making; however, empirical evidence supporting this hypothesis within Iranian intensive care unit settings remains limited.
objectiveTo examine the correlations between perceived autonomy, nurse-physician collaboration, and clinical decision-making ability among intensive care unit nurses.
methodsThis study employed a cross-sectional design, with 400 intensive care unit nurses from two university hospitals in Tehran completing validated Persian versions of the P-AITCS-II, the Dempster/DPBS, and the Lauri & Salanterä instruments to measure interprofessional collaboration, professional autonomy, and clinical decision-making, respectively. We followed STROBE reporting recommendations. Descriptive statistics characterized the sample and scale scores. Bivariate associations were assessed using correlation and group-comparison tests, and multiple linear regression was employed to estimate the independent associations of autonomy and collaboration with decision-making after adjusting for relevant covariates. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained.
resultsThe study sample comprised 400 participants, with a mean age of 33.19 years (SD = 5.67). In bivariate analyses, higher perceived autonomy and greater interprofessional collaboration were positively associated with better clinical decision-making (p < 0.05). In multivariable linear regression models that included covariates, perceived autonomy and interprofessional collaboration remained independent predictors of decision-making ability (p < 0.05). The entire model explained approximately 14.2% of the variance in decision-making, suggesting that additional determinants may influence nurses' decision-making processes. The total mean score of the participants was classified at an intuitive-analytic decision-making level, indicating a combined reliance on experience-based intuition and structured analytic processes.
conclusionsAmong the intensive care unit nurses within this sample, higher perceived professional autonomy and enhanced interprofessional collaboration were independently correlated with improved self-reported clinical decision-making capabilities. Given the cross-sectional nature of the study, causality cannot be established. Longitudinal research employing objective performance metrics is necessary to examine causal relationships and to guide organizational strategies that foster both autonomy and collaborative practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.