Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41364685›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Nurse-physician collaboration, autonomy, and decision-making ability among intensive care unit nurses in Tehran, Iran: A cross-sectional study.

Sogand Sarmadi, Neda Sanaie, Mahsa Boozari Pour, Akbar Zare-Kaseb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sogand SarmadiStudent Research Committee, Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2219-0817
Neda SanaieDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahsa Boozari PourDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Akbar Zare-KasebClinical Research Development Center, Shahid Modarres Educational hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0014-7104

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical decision-making by intensive care unit nurses is vital for ensuring patient safety. It is hypothesized that professional autonomy and interprofessional collaboration are determinants that influence the quality of decision-making; however, empirical evidence supporting this hypothesis within Iranian intensive care unit settings remains limited.

objectiveTo examine the correlations between perceived autonomy, nurse-physician collaboration, and clinical decision-making ability among intensive care unit nurses.

methodsThis study employed a cross-sectional design, with 400 intensive care unit nurses from two university hospitals in Tehran completing validated Persian versions of the P-AITCS-II, the Dempster/DPBS, and the Lauri & Salanterä instruments to measure interprofessional collaboration, professional autonomy, and clinical decision-making, respectively. We followed STROBE reporting recommendations. Descriptive statistics characterized the sample and scale scores. Bivariate associations were assessed using correlation and group-comparison tests, and multiple linear regression was employed to estimate the independent associations of autonomy and collaboration with decision-making after adjusting for relevant covariates. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained.

resultsThe study sample comprised 400 participants, with a mean age of 33.19 years (SD = 5.67). In bivariate analyses, higher perceived autonomy and greater interprofessional collaboration were positively associated with better clinical decision-making (p < 0.05). In multivariable linear regression models that included covariates, perceived autonomy and interprofessional collaboration remained independent predictors of decision-making ability (p < 0.05). The entire model explained approximately 14.2% of the variance in decision-making, suggesting that additional determinants may influence nurses' decision-making processes. The total mean score of the participants was classified at an intuitive-analytic decision-making level, indicating a combined reliance on experience-based intuition and structured analytic processes.

conclusionsAmong the intensive care unit nurses within this sample, higher perceived professional autonomy and enhanced interprofessional collaboration were independently correlated with improved self-reported clinical decision-making capabilities. Given the cross-sectional nature of the study, causality cannot be established. Longitudinal research employing objective performance metrics is necessary to examine causal relationships and to guide organizational strategies that foster both autonomy and collaborative practice.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingDecision MakingIntensive Care UnitsNursesPhysician-Nurse RelationsProfessional AutonomyAdultCooperative BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41364685
PMCPMC12688092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.