ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2025
The perceptual and neural processing of familiar faces is shaped by the statistical regularities of real-world viewing.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Face recognition depends upon the ability to match a visual image to a representation stored in memory. During natural viewing, observers fixate centrally on faces, resulting in face parts appearing in specific spatial locations. We examined whether this perceptual experience influences the cognitive and neural mechanisms involved in face recognition. Participants viewed left/right or upper/lower face halves presented in typical (eg left face half in left visual field) or atypical (eg left face half in right visual field) locations. For familiar faces, familiarity judgments were faster and more accurate when face halves were displayed in typical locations. To examine the neural correlates of this recognition bias, fMRI was used to measure responses to familiar face halves presented in typical or atypical spatial locations. Early visual areas (V1-V4) showed responses primarily determined by visual field and were not sensitive to typical spatial presentation. In contrast, the occipital face area and the fusiform face area exhibited greater activations for face halves presented in their typical spatial location. This bias was also evident in regions beyond the visual brain. These findings suggest that higher-level representations used in the perceptual processing of familiar faces are influenced by statistical regularities in real-world face viewing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.