ArticlePloS one2025
Potential analgesic function of the clitoris in pregnant women: A feasibility study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04257318 (Clitoris Potential Analgesic Function Research by Pregnant Women), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clitoris Potential Analgesic Function Research by Pregnant Women : Feasibility Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, the clitoris is considered to exist solely for sexual pleasure. This prospective, single-centre pilot study focuses on and evaluates an alternative function of the clitoris; pain relief during pregnancy and childbirth. Conducted between 2020 and 2023 at Rouen University Hospital, France, this feasibility study challenges the assertion of the singular function of the clitoris. The primary aim was to assess the acceptability of an intervention focusing on the potential analgesic function of the clitoris. The secondary aim was to assess pain relief. Pregnant women were offered the option of self-external massage with a vibrating device (OVD) in the clitoral suspensory ligament area for pain relief. Data were collected via a self-schedule for precise use of the method, including pain assessment before and after the use of the OVD via a self-analytic visual scale. Acceptability was considered to have been achieved if the woman used the OVD at least twice. Comparisons before and after were performed by means of a student's t-test. With respect to acceptability, among the 32 women included, 26 (81.25%) used an OVD at least twice. Despite concerns about sexual intimacy and the sensitive period of pregnancy, this preliminary feasibility study confirmed the suitability of this mechanical vibration for the majority of the women included. In terms of pain relief, these 26 women used the OVD to manage 304 painful episodes and the feeling of relief was reported in 86.2% of these episodes. Based on a small sample size, the numerical results are obviously highly relative to the disparity of situations and feelings. However, these few consistent reports of a positive analgesic effect encourage further studies into the potential analgesic function of the clitoris.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.