ArticleScience progress
Machine learning-based forecasting of urban fire impact in city environments.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study develops a predictive model to help fire departments improve resource allocation by estimating the likelihood of fire escalation.MethodsWe analyzed 47,382 fire incidents from a city in Taiwan, applying an XGBoost model trained on building characteristics, temporal factors, and geographic information system-derived spatial features. The model was validated using 5-fold cross-validation, temporal holdouts, and geographic tests.ResultsThe model achieved 85.6% accuracy and an AUC of 0.83. Fires were more likely to escalate in older buildings, at night, and on weekends, with building structure, use, and number of floors identified as the strongest predictors. A retrospective simulation suggested that model-informed dispatch could reduce property damage by 25%, firefighter injuries by 21%, and response times by 18%.ImplicationsThese findings demonstrate the potential of predictive analytics to enhance real-time firefighting efficiency and public safety. While promising, the framework requires validation in other cities and with more granular severity scales to ensure broader applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.