Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41364455›Full record

Trial reportJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2026

Efficacy and safety of a novel, extended-release rivastigmine transdermal patch (TW-4752N) in patients with Alzheimer's disease: A 24-week randomized, double-blind trial with a 28-week open-label extension.

Yu Nakamura, Takaya Kurokawa, Shun Terashima, Akira Nishimura

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yu NakamuraDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan.
Takaya KurokawaClinical Development Department, Pharmaceutical Development Unit, R&D Division, Towa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0009-0005-3495-2995
Shun TerashimaClinical Development Department, Pharmaceutical Development Unit, R&D Division, Towa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Akira NishimuraClinical Development Department, Pharmaceutical Development Unit, R&D Division, Towa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundRivastigmine may offer greater efficacy and convenience of use with a novel formulation than previously reported.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel, twice-weekly rivastigmine patch (TW-4752N) (TW) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients with mild to moderate dementia.MethodsThis was a multicenter, phase III, double-blind study comparing TW and an existing rivastigmine transdermal patch (RT) with an open-label extension. The primary endpoint was the change in ADAS-Jcog total score at week 24 from baseline. Secondary endpoints included the ADAS-Jcog total score at weeks 8, 16, and 24.ResultsA total of 354 and 362 patients were available for efficacy and safety analysis, respectively. Changes in ADAS-Jcog total score at week 24 from baseline were similar between the two groups in the full analysis set with an intergroup difference of -0.84 ± 0.44 (95% CI, -1.695 to 0.016) and with the upper limit of the 95% CI being below the non-inferiority margin of 1.1, demonstrating the non-inferiority of TW. However, analysis of the per-protocol set demonstrated a significant intergroup difference in favor of TW likely suggesting a greater treatment effect with TW than with RT (p = 0.032). Adverse events (AEs) reported in ≥3% of patients were similar between the groups, with the only AE with an intergroup difference of ≥10% in incidence being application site pruritus (TW/RT, 27.6%/17.1%).ConclusionsTW represents a viable alternative option of interest to patients with AD, providing comparable or potentially greater efficacy than RT and comparable safety, as well as greater convenience of use.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCholinesterase InhibitorsRivastigmineTransdermal PatchAgedAged, 80 and overDelayed-Action PreparationsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeCholinesterase InhibitorsDelayed-Action PreparationsRivastigmineAlzheimer's diseasedementiaefficacyrandomized controlled trialrivastigminetransdermal patch

Identifiers

PMID41364455
PMCPMC13279984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.