Trial reportJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2026
Efficacy and safety of a novel, extended-release rivastigmine transdermal patch (TW-4752N) in patients with Alzheimer's disease: A 24-week randomized, double-blind trial with a 28-week open-label extension.
Trial report in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of the Efficacy of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease, Literature Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Advanced Drug Delivery Strategies in Geriatric Patients with Polypharmacy: Integrating Pharmacokinetics, Personalized Medicine, and Emerging Technologies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundRivastigmine may offer greater efficacy and convenience of use with a novel formulation than previously reported.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel, twice-weekly rivastigmine patch (TW-4752N) (TW) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients with mild to moderate dementia.MethodsThis was a multicenter, phase III, double-blind study comparing TW and an existing rivastigmine transdermal patch (RT) with an open-label extension. The primary endpoint was the change in ADAS-Jcog total score at week 24 from baseline. Secondary endpoints included the ADAS-Jcog total score at weeks 8, 16, and 24.ResultsA total of 354 and 362 patients were available for efficacy and safety analysis, respectively. Changes in ADAS-Jcog total score at week 24 from baseline were similar between the two groups in the full analysis set with an intergroup difference of -0.84 ± 0.44 (95% CI, -1.695 to 0.016) and with the upper limit of the 95% CI being below the non-inferiority margin of 1.1, demonstrating the non-inferiority of TW. However, analysis of the per-protocol set demonstrated a significant intergroup difference in favor of TW likely suggesting a greater treatment effect with TW than with RT (p = 0.032). Adverse events (AEs) reported in ≥3% of patients were similar between the groups, with the only AE with an intergroup difference of ≥10% in incidence being application site pruritus (TW/RT, 27.6%/17.1%).ConclusionsTW represents a viable alternative option of interest to patients with AD, providing comparable or potentially greater efficacy than RT and comparable safety, as well as greater convenience of use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.