ArticleJAMA network open2025
Risk and Outcomes of Secondary Cancer Among Lung Cancer Survivors After Definitive Treatment.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment strategies and outcomes in patients with synchronous multiple primary malignancies involving lung cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Impact of prior malignancy on non-small cell lung cancer presentation, management, and survival.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Second primary cancers are an important cause of morbidity, mortality, and resource use among lung cancer survivors, yet their risk relative to recurrence and their determinants have been incompletely defined. Objectives: To quantify the competing risks of recurrence, intrathoracic new cancer (locoregional or distant recurrences confined to the thorax and/or second primary lung cancers), and non-lung secondary cancers (NLSCs) after curative-intent local therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to identify clinical factors associated with NLSC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included consecutive stage I to III NSCLC survivors treated with definitive local therapy and evaluated in a dedicated survivorship clinic at a single high-volume academic cancer center from January to May 2019. Follow-up was measured from completion of local therapy; eligible participants were disease-free 12 months or longer following curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy. Data were analyzed in October 2025. Exposures: Definitive local therapy (surgery or radiotherapy) for NSCLC followed by survivorship care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcomes were incidence and timing of recurrence, NLSC, intrathoracic new cancer, extrathoracic cancer, or death measured using nonparametric cumulative incidence functions (CIFs), with death as a competing event, and multivariable Fine-Gray and cause-specific Cox models for NLSC. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Among 496 survivors (58.5% female [290]; median [IQR] age, 69.1 [62.8-74.3] years), the median (IQR) follow-up was 71.6 (57.7-84.8) months. Of these patients, 367 (74.0%) were former smokers; the index cancer was adenocarcinoma in 372 (75.0%); 337 (67.9%) had stage I disease, 72 (14.5%) had stage II, and 87 (17.5%) had stage III. Recurrence occurred in 67 of 496 patients (13.5%). Secondary cancers developed in 116 of 496 patients (23.4%), including a new primary lung cancer in 77 of 496 patients (15.5%) and NLSC in 39 of 496 patients (7.9%). Median (IQR) time to diagnosis of an NLSC was 52.3 (35.9-65.6) months, and CIFs (competing risks) at 5 years (death and other first events treated as competing risks) were 11.5% for recurrence, 5.6% for NLSC, 16.8% for intrathoracic new cancer, and 10.4% for extrathoracic cancer. In Fine-Gray models, a hereditary syndrome and/or pathogenic germline variant was associated with higher risk for NLSC (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 10.76; 95% CI, 4.62-25.06; P < .001), whereas pack-years (per 10) were not associated with higher risk (SHR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.03; P = .85). Cause-specific Cox results were concordant (HR, 8.32; 95% CI, 3.14-22.02; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of NSCLC survivors, the risk of NLSC was clinically meaningful and distinct from intrathoracic new cancers. Genetic predisposition correlated with NLSC risk and should inform survivorship care pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.