SynthesisIrish journal of medical science2026
Risk factors of thirst amongst critically ill and patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Demographic, perioperative, biochemical and illness-severity predictors of thirst in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Internal medicine journal · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThirst is common and distressing symptom among critically ill patients, yet its risk factors remain unclear. This review evaluates associations between clinical factors-including age, opioid use, ASA classification, diuretic use, oral rehydration practices, and NPO status-and thirst in critically ill and surgical patients.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, CNKI, and the Cochrane Library from inception to March 2025. Studies assessing risk factors for thirst using validated scales were included. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models with DerSimonian-Laird estimation, and heterogeneity was evaluated via Cochran's Q and I
resultsFifteen studies were included. Meta-analysis of 10 studies comparing age (N = 5644) yielded a weighted mean difference (WMD) of 1.080 years (95%CI: -0.673 to 2.833; p = 0.227; I
conclusionsAlthough trends suggest that factors such as opioid use and higher ASA classification may increase odds of thirst, no single risk factor consistently predicts thirst among critically ill patients. Substantial heterogeneity across studies and potential publication bias underscore the need for further well-designed research to clarify these associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41364408What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.