Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41364378›Full record

ArticlePituitary2025

Rebirth of an old modality: revisiting intraoperative ultrasound in pituitary surgery.

Hamid Borghei-Razavi, Jamie J Van Gompel

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hamid Borghei-RazaviDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Pauline Braathen Neurological Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA. borgheh2@ccf.org.
Jamie J Van GompelDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Vangompel.jamie@mayo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pituitary adenomas are prevalent intracranial tumors that, though benign, present surgical challenges due to their anatomy and hormonal behavior. Transsphenoidal surgery is the standard approach, but differentiation between normal gland and adenoma limits complete resection. Traditional imaging methods like MRI and CT are costly and disruptive, while intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) offers a real-time, practical alternative for enhancing localization and surgical confidence. Recent advances in IOUS technology show promise, yet challenges such as spatial resolution and operator dependency hinder widespread use. This editorial discusses the potential of IOUS as a vital tool for improving safety and outcomes in pituitary adenoma surgeries.

Indexed as

AdenomaPituitary GlandPituitary NeoplasmsHumansUltrasonographyIntraoperative ultrasound (IOUS)Pituitary adenomaPituitary surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.