Observational studyClinical oral investigations2025
Digital quantitative analysis of noncarious cervical Lesions, occlusal tooth Wear, and gingival recession: results from a 25-Year clinical Follow-Up study.
Observational study in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical performance of a bulk-fill versus a nanofilled resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions with different extensions: a 6-years randomized, parallel, double-blind clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Trial
- Thirty-six months in vivo wear of enamel antagonists to monolithic zirconia crowns.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Noncarious Cervical Lesions and Associated Factors After Orthodontic Treatment: A Long-Term Follow-Up.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo quantitatively evaluate the progression of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs), gingival recession (GR), and occlusal tooth wear (OTW) over 25 years.
methodsThis observational, retrospective study involved 33 dental students who completed a questionnaire regarding their oral habits, diet, and health information. Impressions from the baseline and the 25-year follow-up were used to create digital casts, which were analyzed with 3D software (Geomagic Control; 3D Systems) to measure the progression of NCCLs, GR, and OTW. Occlusal analysis from Phase I, using the T-Scan system (Tekscan), was also included to evaluate occlusal interferences.
resultsNCCL dimensions (area, height, and width) showed moderate associations with GR and only weak correlations with OTW. Multivariate regression analyses identified significant factors associated with NCCL progression. For NCCLs, visible plaque, vigorous toothbrushing, occlusal interferences, dentin hypersensitivity, alcohol consumption, smoking, and frequent exposure to acidic or cariogenic diets were associated with increased NCCL progression. For GR, was significantly associated with occlusal contact, dentin hypersensitivity, alcohol consumption, and smoking. For OTW, unilateral mastication, long-term orthodontic treatment, and smoking were positively correlated with wear progression.
conclusionsMechanical and behavioral factors-particularly vigorous toothbrushing, occlusal interferences, and lifestyle habits such as smoking and alcohol consumption-significantly influenced the long-term progression of NCCLs, GR, and OTW. Mandibular molars and premolars were the most frequently affected teeth. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The use of digital three-dimensional analysis allows accurate monitoring of NCCLs, GR, and OTW. Preventive measures should prioritize controllable risk factors, including brushing habits, smoking, alcohol consumption, and occlusal imbalances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41364373What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.