ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
Imaging and clinical features of emphysematous osteomyelitis.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo characterize the clinical and imaging features of emphysematous osteomyelitis (EO) in a single-center cohort and to expand upon existing literature, which is largely limited to isolated case reports. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective, IRB-approved study included patients identified through a PACS search for "intraosseous gas" or "intraosseous air" on CT or MRI from January 2014 to May 2025. Patients were excluded if intraosseous gas was attributable to trauma, open wounds, penetrating injury, or recent surgery. Clinical, laboratory, imaging, microbiologic, and histopathologic data were recorded.
resultsOf 382 patients with intraosseous gas, 20 were included in the study. The mean age was 63 years, and 80% were male. Diabetes mellitus was present in 75% of patients. The foot was the most commonly involved site (75%). The "pumice stone" sign was observed in 50% of cases. Osseous erosions, periostitis and soft tissue emphysema were seen in 60%, 15% and 85% of patients, respectively. Radiographs were less sensitive than CT or MRI. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were markedly elevated (mean 114 mm/hr and 210 mg/L, respectively). Among 14 culture-positive cases, 64% were polymicrobial, most originating from the foot. Surgical intervention was required in 83% of patients, including amputation in 67%.
conclusionEO is a rare, aggressive infection that primarily affects older patients with diabetes. The foot was the most common site, frequently associated with polymicrobial infection. Characteristic imaging features of osteomyelitis, such as erosion and periostitis, may be absent. Early recognition is essential, as most patients require surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41364363What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.