ReviewCurrent urology reports2025
Cost Consideration for the Treatment of Peyronie's Disease: A Narrative Review.
Review in Current urology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewPeyronie's disease (PD) is an acquired penile deformity that causes penile shortening, narrowing, erectile dysfunction, and pain. Current treatment modalities include penile traction therapy (PTT), Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCh) injections, and surgical straightening procedures which have varying levels of expected deformity correction and associated side effects. Similarly, these treatments have varying levels of both out-of-pocket and total costs for the healthcare system as a whole. This review aims to summarize the current literature regarding the costs of treatment modalities available for PD. RECENT
findingsCurrent well-supported treatment options for PD can be categorized into three groups: PTT, CCh, and surgical straightening. CCh injection therapy is gaining popularity but remains the single most expensive therapy for PD. PTT has demonstrated modest curve reduction efficacy, and may be an approachable initial therapy modality for select patients. Penile plication and penile plaque incision/excision surgery are more definitive surgical options that are less expensive than CCh injections but more expensive than PTT. While the literature continues to evolve with emerging guidelines and FDA approvals, PTT remains the lowest absolute cost option while CCh injections and penile plication surgery are the higher cost options. PTT and injection therapy are time intensive which must be taken into account in any discussion of cost-effectiveness. More research remains to be performed to consider cost-effectiveness of various treatment options for PD patients while taking into account efficacy, opportunity cost, and patient quality of life. Urologists treating patients with PD must understand the economic aspects of the evolving treatment landscape to effectively guide management for each patient to enhance quality of life and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41364316What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.