ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Three-dimensional assessment of tooth movements in clear aligner treatment of moderate and severe crowding.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The 'Roller Coaster Effect' in Clear Aligner Premolar Extraction Cases: Posterior Open Bite and Cephalometric Risk Factors.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate angular and linear tooth movements following orthodontic treatment for correction of moderate to severe crowding using clear aligner therapy (CAT). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 46 patients treated with clear aligners in permanent dentition for correction of moderate to severe crowding. Twenty-three patients (6 males, 17 females; mean age 20.0 years) were treated with premolar extractions and 23 patients (8 males, 15 females; mean age 17.3 years) were treated without premolar extractions. Three-dimensional tooth linear and angular displacements were quantified in the pre- and post-treatment digital dental models superimposed using the Slicer Automated Dental Tools module of 3D Slicer software ( www.slicer.org ). Generalized estimation equations were used for group comparisons (p < 0.05).
resultsCAT correction of moderate to severe crowding with premolar extraction led to significant retroclination of upper and lower incisors (upper: -6.71° ±7.79, P < 0.001 and lower: -5.11° ±8.49, P < 0.001). Anchorage control in extraction cases was limited, with approximately equal molar mesialization and incisor lingualization. In non-extraction cases, crowding was corrected through arch expansion with flaring of incisors. Vertical changes were similar between groups.
conclusionsCAT of moderate to severe crowding without extraction led to arch expansion and proclination of incisors. In contrast, premolar extraction cases often presented incisor retroclination and molar mesial tipping, requiring careful biomechanical management. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings help clinicians plan treatments, manage patient expectations, and anticipate side effects, enabling the use of proper strategies and resources to optimize outcomes in both extraction and non-extraction cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.