Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41364274›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2025

Husbandry and breeding practices of alpaca farmers in Ecuador and Peru: an exploratory study.

Jana Marešová, Tersia Kokošková, Tamara Fedorova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jana MarešováDepartment of Animal Science and Food Processing, Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Praha - Suchdol, 165 00, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3425-8256
Tersia KokoškováDepartment of Animal Science and Food Processing, Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Praha - Suchdol, 165 00, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9557-3335
Tamara FedorovaDepartment of Animal Science and Food Processing, Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Praha - Suchdol, 165 00, Czech Republic. fedorova@ftz.czu.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3209-6572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

South American camelids (SACs) play an important socioeconomic role in the Andean regions. This study aimed to investigate the differences in alpaca farming and husbandry practices between Ecuador and Peru, and to analyse the effects of the farmers’ gender and the length of SACs farming experience thereon. A total of 102 alpaca (Vicugna pacos) farmers completed a questionnaire. The mean SACs farming experience was significantly lower in Ecuador than in Peru, and more experienced farmers kept significantly larger alpaca herds. Women were more often involved in alpaca farming than men in Peru. The main purpose of alpaca farming was for fibre and meat production. In Ecuador, 68.2% of the farmers kept the breeding males and females together during the whole year, while in Peru, 69.0% of farmers kept them separately and managed their breeding period. Significant calving seasonality was observed in both countries, with the peak of calving season in February. Farmers from both countries indicated that the most common problems included internal and external parasites, as well as a lack of pasture available. These are areas that require further attention from researchers and governments to enhance the sustainability of alpaca production. Additionally, understanding possible barriers for women in Ecuador regarding involvement in alpaca farming could contribute towards future development efforts.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryBreedingCamelids, New WorldFarmersAnimalsEcuadorFemaleHumansMalePeruReproductionSeasonsSurveys and QuestionnairesAlpacaCalving seasonFarmers’ genderHusbandry problemsReproductive management

Identifiers

PMID41364274
PMCPMC12689803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.