ReviewEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2026
A review of management of benign post-esophagectomy respiratory-digestive fistula in esophageal cancer in China.
Review in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-esophagectomy respiratory-digestive fistula (PERDF) is a life-threatening complication that can develop after esophageal cancer resection. This complication consists of an abnormal connection formed between the digestive tract and the respiratory tract. Digestive juices can migrate into the respiratory tract through the fistula, leading to severe lung infections in PERDF patients which may cause sepsis, shock, or death. Although conservative treatments form the basis of management, they are often insufficient when used alone. Alternative therapies, including stent implantation, surgery, and endoscopic treatment, are crucial for effective management. Stent implantation is the most extensively studied and widely used method at present. Endoscopic treatment can be seen as an alternative once stenting fails. Surgery is usually limited by the patients' general condition. In some cases, it can be performed on patients with complex anatomical structures, failed stent implantation, or ineffective endoscopic treatment. In this article, we summarize current therapeutic strategies for PERDF and evaluate the potential of absorbable hydrogels as a future treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41364263What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.