Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Assessing endocrine resistance: monitoring circulating ESR1 mutations in Irosustat-treated ER positive breast cancer.
Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to investigate the prevalence and spectrum of ESR1 mutations alongside cell-free DNA (cfDNA) dynamics in patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer recruited to the phase II IRIS study who had progressed on first-line aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy and then continued their AI in combination with Irusostat (40 mg), an irreversible steroid sulfatase inhibitor.
methodscfDNA was isolated from 96 serial plasma samples from 24 patients, alongside primary tumour DNA (n = 16), and analysed by next-generation sequencing using a custom-designed mutation panel on the Illumina NovaSeq platform.
resultsThirteen of 16 tumour DNA samples harboured at least one somatic mutation across nine genes. Twenty one of the 24 patients (88%) had at least one somatic mutation in cfDNA (248 total mutations across 10 genes). Circulating tumour DNA ESR1 mutations (ctESR1m) were the most prevalent, present in 16 patients (76%) with both stable (SD) and progressive disease (PD), showing no clear association with disease progression. Eleven patients had polyclonal ctESR1m within the ligand-binding domain, six at baseline, while five harboured a single ctESR1m variant. Five other patients acquired polyclonal mutations over treatment.
conclusionsAnalysis of serial plasma samples revealed highly dynamic ctESR1m during AI treatment and frequent detection of polyclonal ctESR1m in patients (both with SD and PD) recruited to the IRIS study. These findings, albeit in a limited sample size, underscore the challenge of targeting a single ESR1 mutation and emphasise the need for careful patient selection, specifically those with wild-type ESR1, in trials investigating sequential estrogen-lowering therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.