ArticleArchives of microbiology2025
RNA editing signatures and codon adaptation reveal potential translational compatibility between Hendra virus and its natural host Pteropus Alecto.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Hendra virus (HeV), a very lethal zoonotic pathogen, demonstrates complex evolutionary dynamics with its natural reservoir, Pteropus alecto. This study meticulously compares codon usage bias (CUB), dinucleotide frequencies, RNA editing patterns, and the Relative Codon Deoptimization Index (RCDI) to elucidate virus–host co-adaptation. The average Effective Number of Codons (ENC) data showed very little bias in codon usage, which indicates potential translational compatibility. Even though HeV and P. alecto had different nucleotide compositions, both genomes showed the same CpG suppression and a preference for certain codons, including AGG. Amino acid profile showed that leucine was the most common amino acid, and tryptophan was the least common. The relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) study indicated unique yet intersecting codon preferences in both the virus and the host. Evolutionary investigations employing ENC–GC3, parity rule 2, and neutrality plots indicated that natural selection mostly influences viral codon usage, while host codon bias is principally affected by mutational pressure. Analysis of RNA editing sites showed that C-to-T transitions were the most common, followed by A-to-G modifications. This shows how host-mediated editing mechanisms play a role in viral evolution. The RCDI analysis provided additional evidence for the moderate translational adaptation of HeV to P. alecto. Together, these results improve our knowledge of how viruses and hosts interact at the molecular level and give us possible targets for monitoring and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41364244What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.