ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Development and Evaluation of an Augmented Artificial Intelligence Model for Urogynecology Queries.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- ChatGPT Health and ChatGPT Plus in Urogynecology: A Blinded Comparison of Response Quality, Guideline Concordance, and Safety.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Improving Pelvic Floor Disorder Education: A Second Pilot of a Retrieval-Augmented AI Chatbot Model.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Evaluation Methods for Inference-Time Retrieval-Augmented and Graph Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models in Health Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Education: A Clinical Reflection : (Comment on "Development and Evaluation of an Augmented Artificial Intelligence Model for Urogynecology Queries").International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe objective was to develop a retrieval-augmented ChatGPT model grounded in evidence-based patient education materials and compare its performance against the standard ChatGPT model in responding to common urogynecology patient questions in this pilot study.
methodsWe developed a retrieval-augmented ChatGPT-4.0 model that prioritized content from International Urogynecological Association patient information leaflets. Ten commonly asked patient questions were submitted to both the standard and retrieval-augmented models. Six board-certified urogynecologists evaluated responses using the validated Quality Analysis of Medical Artificial Intelligence (QAMAI) tool, which assesses accuracy, clarity, relevance, completeness, usefulness, and sources. Total and domain-specific QAMAI scores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and a sensitivity analysis was performed, excluding the unblinded Source domain.
resultsThe retrieval-augmented model demonstrated significantly higher total QAMAI scores than the standard model (median 22 [interquartile range, IQR, 19-25] vs 16 [IQR 13-18], p < 0.01) and outperformed the standard model in all six domains. In the sensitivity analysis, the retrieval-augmented model maintained significantly higher performance (18 [IQR 16-20] vs 14.5 [IQR 11-17], p < 0.01). Clinician raters preferred the retrieval-augmented model in 81% of responses.
conclusionsGrounding AI tools in vetted patient education materials significantly improved the quality of ChatGPT-generated responses in urogynecology. Retrieval-augmented models offer a promising approach to enhance patient education and promote patient-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.