ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasms in male patients exhibit different clinical and imaging features compared with those in female patients.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and imaging features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) in men and to compare with those in women.
methodsOne hundred twenty-two patients (38 men and 84 women) with histologically confirmed SPNs from seven institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical data, including demographics and preoperative diagnoses, were reviewed, and imaging characteristics on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and
resultsMen were significantly older than women (mean age: 43.7 years vs. 31.1 years, p < 0.001) and had smaller tumors (mean size: 28.5 mm vs. 38.5 mm, p = 0.014). Regarding preoperative diagnosis, SPN was suspected less frequently in men (p < 0.001), with a higher rate of biopsy (p = 0.006). Imaging characteristics revealed that SPNs in men had fewer hemorrhagic changes (p = 0.035), more frequent internal calcifications (p = 0.003), and a higher proportion of solid components (p = 0.009). In women, tumor size (ρ = - 0.292, p = 0.007) and the proportion of solid components (ρ = - 0.276, p = 0.011) negatively correlated with age, whereas no correlations were observed in men.
conclusionSPNs in men exhibit distinct clinical and imaging characteristics, including older age, smaller size, a greater proportion of solid components, and fewer degenerative features compared with those in women. Recognizing these sex-specific differences is important for improving diagnostic accuracy and guiding the optimal management of patients with SPNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41364222What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.