Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41364139›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2025

Safety in numbers? Evidence of non-social behaviour in the moon jellyfish Aurelia spp.

Alessandra Pecunioso, Christian Agrillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alessandra PecuniosoDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padova, Italy.
Christian AgrilloDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padova, Italy. christian.agrillo@unipd.it.

Funding

University of Padova DOR grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When animals explore a novel environment, they often aggregate in groups rather than staying isolated to reduce the risks of predation. This effect is known as ‘safety in numbers’ and has been widely reported in terrestrial and aquatic species. Jellyfish are often found to be clustered in the same areas in seas and oceans. Here, we asked whether one reason for such behavior might be the tendency to actively join other conspecifics when encountering novel environments. We observed moon jellyfish (Aurelia spp.) in a free-choice test measuring the proportion of time spent near conspecifics when they are inserted into an unfamiliar environment. We found evidence that jellyfish detect the presence of other conspecifics and use this information to actively direct their behavior in a given direction. Contrary to what was expected by the ‘safety in numbers’ effect, moon jellyfish have significantly distanced themselves from their social companions throughout the whole observation period. This result suggests that, although moon jellyfish are commonly observed in large aggregates in nature due to various environmental factors, they may exhibit limited social behavior in unfamiliar environments.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalScyphozoaSocial BehaviorAnimalsCnidariasEmbodied cognitionShoal choiceSocial behavior

Identifiers

PMID41364139
PMCPMC12689779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.